Espionage: NSA scapegoat of the OTTs who hide the smoking gun
And a few hours ago, the news that Yahoo will encrypt the data flows passing through their servers.
To announce it was Marissa Meyer. ( source article on the Corriere delle Comunicazioni ).
Google also follows the same strategy and announces the "uproxy" system with which to protect itself from third-party intrusions ( article su Key4biz ).
But the paradox is as big as a planet: the OTTs are announcing that they are encrypting data to "protect" users from NSA espionage, which has the task of fighting terrorism ....
In short, it seems that the bad guys are only those of the NSA, who have spied on everyone.
But the truth, analyzing with a minimum of critical spirit, it is much more frightening and a disconcerting banality.
To spy on everything and everyone, they are the OTTs.
They do this to profile advertisements ( … At best).
… .At worst case scenario, they may have developed a series of forecasting algorithms, of espionage and calculation capable of determining group dynamics from a social point of view, political and financial, could operate, very simply, Industrial espionage, they could segment users and companies for strategic news to be resold to banks, insurance companies and pharmaceutical companies ....
Imagine for a moment a user writing an email, or a text message or a message via the "free" app, where he mentions a medicine that is used to treat cancer.
This news would appeal to the insurance company that has a health policy for its client, as well as to the bank that "poor thing", would fear not being able to return any loan granted ad personam.
Another example that concerns companies, within which news is exchanged ( trasformate in bit, then email, sms, messages on cell , fax , documents that transit via wi-fi, BT ecc ecc ) on development strategies for innovative products and services to be patented ... excellent material to "anticipate" the competition and compete unfairly on the market.
It doesn't take a science fiction film writer to imagine all of this.
And it is pointed out that the technology developed by search engines, serves to analyze , catalog and propose contents according to specific words .... those themselves, that the "spy filters" are able to identify within the e-mails, some sms, messages through apps, and even through speech!!!!
well yes!!!… potentially even everything we say through smartphones, landline and voice over IP applications ( Voip ) is "scannable", adjustable, fileable and listenable by those who have developed the algorithms to identify the keywords of a conversation.
Not, if all this sounds like fantasy to you, think again!
Google was ordered to pay a fine of 22,5 Millions of dollars ( … .Crumbs, when compared to the earnings made ) for spying on PERSONAL information of millions of users between 2010 and the 2011, via your Safari browser.
It is a New York judge who issued this sentence, and Attorney General Eric Schneiderman upped the ante, referring to users, and saying that "Google has not only violated their privacy but also their trust". “ ( source article su Key4biz ).
So the question we all ask is: but if the OTTs have already spied and continue to spy on everything that passes through their serevr , what are the algorithms for encrypting incoming and outgoing data streams and who guarantees that they stop spying on us?!
… .On the other hand, be the owner of the algorithm that obfuscates the information, does not guarantee from the potential fact that the same owner can use it to spy ...
And then the NSA has acres of servers to crack any J protection protocol
In the face of these FACTS, it is even more dishonorable and aberrant to note that there are Italian institutional representatives ready to weaken the proposal to tax OTTs ( source article on the Information Courier ).
These already make money thanks to non-transparent strategies, plus they don't pay taxes!!!!
Ad es Apple ( source article Data manager )
What do our institutions and control bodies want to do to continue to facilitate this nauseating state of affairs?!
ComputArte copyright