ROMA 29 September 2015
But cell phones are dangerous?
This thorny and "controversial" topic had already been dealt with in this article : https://www.computarte.it/artetecnologica/2014/05/04/nuove-tecnologie-avverse-ai-bioritmi-e-cancerogene/ focusing attention on the fact that already after a few minutes of conversation on the cell phone, the salivary glands began to produce not only free radicals, but also toxic peroxide (https://www.wellme.it/salute/news/6705-telefoni-cellulari-cancro-saliva ).
Remembering to ALWAYS read the instructions and especially the SAFETY warnings, where it is unequivocally written to always keep the mobile phone at a minimum distance of 1,5 cm from the body, the question that arises is : but because they sell a tool that is to be used, we usually attach it to our ear or put it in our pocket?!?!?
Why do manufacturers not propose a solution that includes compliance with safety warnings? , without forcing the user into "unnatural" behavior?
Returning to the initial question, if we had to comply with the Supreme Court ruling regarding Mr.'s case. Innocent Marcolini the answer is YES!
These sources report the details :
http://www.prontoinfermieri.it/item/713-.html
http://www.corriere.it/cronache/10_febbraio_26/cellulare-tumore_8d4229f8-2292-11df-8195-00144f02aabe.shtml?refresh_ce-cp
http://www.ilfattoquotidiano.it/2012/10/18/cassazione-cancro-provocato-dal-cellulare-riconosciuto-legame-diretto/386387/
The COURT OF CASSATION ( which is remembered by many, issues sentences that are NOT APPEALABLE ) he noted ( with sentence 17438 of the Labor Section ) a causality between CANCER and CELL PHONE USE following the documents acquired and verified by Prof's CTU. Angelo Gino Levis, by Prof. Giuseppe Grasso and Prof. B. Skirt, based on INDEPENDENT epidemiological studies conducted by Prof.'s research group. Lennart Hardell , between 2005 and the 2009.
On the Danish research group of Prof. Hardell you can read this source : http://www.disinformazione.it/cellulari_tumori.htm
The ruling in question has been attacked and accused of being unreliable ( bringing into play the CTU of Prof. Levis and colleagues ) , precisely by those who produced a study conducted at European level with the aim of establishing the absolute non-danger of cell phones : Intercom (http://interphone.iarc.fr/ )
But in this interesting article (http://www.epiprev.it/attualit%C3%A0/lo-studio-interphone-%C3%A8-indipendente ) written by some Interphone authors ( Dr. Susanna Lagorio and Dr. Paolo Vecchia ) it can be seen how Prof. Levis not only defends his work and the CTU's findings, but it highlights all the points for which the conclusions of the Intertphone study cannot be considered reliable ( among the main ones ):
-Non-representativeness of the sample chosen for epidemiological studies which "waters down" and mystifies the conclusions
-The source of co-financing of the study ( The lobby of cell phone manufacturing companies… )
Therefore, despite the fact that there are still many "unsuspected" people who have unspecified interests and/or assumptions ( and granted ) ignorance of some facts, continue to highlight that there is NO absolute truth about the fact that the electromagnetic fields generated by cell phones are an element of carcinogenesis ( and I would like to point out this “sparkling” conversation : http://attivissimo.blogspot.it/2015/09/antibufala-donna-francese-riceve.html#comment-form ) , when in doubt, the only attitude to consider is that of prudence and... not holding the cell phone less than 15mm from the body, ALWAYS and especially when you use it to speak!
PS…and we direct users to take note of that the “new SMARTphones”, compared to the old “feature phones“ ( old generation mobile phones ), they are continuously receiving and transmitting as the operating system ( android, iOs, tizen and co.…) it is engineered to allow APPs to take possession of content ( private ) with the aim of "exporting" them to someone's cloud... who will resell them, with considerable profit, all our data!
ComputArte copyright